Order this book
Finally, Best points to a 'striking mood of pessimism [in the US]' (p. 186) - that despite enormous progress and beneficial change in arenas such as health, education, employment and other indices of life quality, there is a concentration upon social problems. In particular, the world is characterised as drenched in random violence and one in which new crimes flourish. This desolation both frightens and paralyses us: for why attempt to make things better when all around us social problems are getting worse and social policies may be reinforcing and adding to the decline. The flip side of this, of course, is that our language can liberate us. We can reject the metaphor of social policy as war: - these rallying cries of unity - against drugs, poverty, breast cancer and so on - which provide an in built language of failure. Instead we can embrace a more complex understanding of social problems locating their emergence within historical and ideological contexts. Best argues that the deconstruction of the linguistic patterns and the analysis of connections between claims of social problems that his books offers may be the first step towards such a liberation.
I do have some reservations. I would like to have seen the analysis taken outside of the almost exclusively US context. The past fifteen years have seen a burgeoning victims' movement throughout Western Europe, Canada and Australia, for example, as well as a concern with violent crime reflected in public discourse and policy. Best's US focus begs the question of how the processes he examines might vary and produce different outcomes in different socio-political contexts. Secondly, his argument could have been strengthened by more explicit links between the sections and a fuller discussion of the opportunity for change. Finally, one carping point: the book's title suggests an analysis specific to violent crimes and their victims, but as the book progresses the subject matter become more generically 'social problems'. This does not damage the arguments made between the covers, but does suggest that a more inclusive title might have been more appropriate.
This is a book rich in detail and the analyses Best makes are cogent, forensic and revealing. It would be of interest to anyone concerned with social movements, crime and victimisation and social policy discourse.
University of Leeds